← All aircraft

Piper · 1977–1989

Piper Turbo Arrow III / Turbo Arrow IV (1977-1989)

piperarrowretractableturbochargedlow-wingComplexhigh-altitudecross-countrytapered-wing200hp

Specifications

Cruise

165KTAS

Range

880nm

Seats

4

Useful Load

1145lbs

Full-fuel payload

683lbs

Fuel Burn

12gph

Fuel Cap.

77gal

MPG

15.8mpg

Stall (Vs0)

55KIAS

T/O roll

1110ft

Ldg roll

645ft

Power

200hp

Engine

piston single

Gear

Retractable

IFR

Yes

Category

certified

Pricing

Typical

$130k

Range

$95k – $175k

Annual all-in

~$17k/yr

All-in estimate at ~100 flying hours a year — fuel, annual inspection, engine reserve, insurance, and hangar. It scales with your actual hours, and insurance and hangar vary most by region and pilot.

Cost to own — estimate

Set your yearly hours and local fuel price. Fixed costs (insurance, hangar, annual inspection) don't change with hours; fuel and the engine reserve do.

100
20300
$6.50
$3$10
Fuel (12 gph)
$7,800
Engine reserve (toward overhaul)
$2,222
Fixed (insurance, hangar, annual, subscriptions)
$6,978
Total per year
$17,000
Per flight hour
$170
Miles flown / year (at cruise)
18,988 mi
Cost per mile
$0.90/mi

Estimate, not a quote — insurance and hangar (the fixed bucket) vary most by region and pilot. Anchored to our model figure at 100 hrs and $6.50/gal.

Title & Escrow partnerExample placement

Strengths

  • 165 KTAS cruise at FL180 rivals Bonanza A36TC at lower acquisition cost
  • 20,000 ft service ceiling enables high-altitude cross-country flights
  • 4-seat configuration with 1,145 lbs useful load for modest loads
  • Tapered-wing design provides stable handling characteristics

Weaknesses

  • Continental TSIO-360 runs hot; cylinder life highly dependent on pilot technique and cool-down discipline
  • T-tail Arrow IV (1979-1989) has reduced pitch authority and stall recovery concerns vs. conventional tail
  • Turbo exhaust system prone to cracking; requires frequent inspection of welds and slip joints
  • Parts incompatibility with naturally-aspirated Arrow IIIs increases maintenance complexity and cost

Overview

The 1977-1989 Piper Turbo Arrow is the turbocharged variant of the Arrow III / Arrow IV -- the same tapered-wing airframe with a Continental TSIO-360 (replacing the NA Arrow's Lycoming IO-360) producing 200 HP through 20,000 ft. The Turbo Arrow targeted Cessna T210, Bonanza A36TC, and Mooney M20K buyers seeking high-altitude cross-country capability at sub-$200K acquisition cost.

Three variants spanned the run:

  • PA-28R-201T Turbo Arrow III (1977-1978): Standard tail, TSIO-360-FB
  • PA-28RT-201T Turbo Arrow IV (1979-1982): T-tail variant, TSIO-360-FB
  • PA-28RT-201T Turbo Arrow IV (late) (1983-1989): T-tail, refined TSIO-360-KB

Approximately 1,500 Turbo Arrows were produced. Production ceased in 1989 as Piper consolidated production around the naturally-aspirated Arrow III.

The Continental Engine Choice

The Turbo Arrow's Continental TSIO-360 is mechanically unrelated to the Arrow III's Lycoming IO-360. Reasons for the engine switch:

  • Continental's TSIO-360 was the only available 200 HP turbocharged 4-cylinder
  • Lycoming did not produce a turbocharged 360 cubic inch variant
  • Continental's TBO 1,800 hrs vs Lycoming's 2,000 hrs is a slight disadvantage
  • Continental cylinder reliability is more dependent on operational technique

The engine switch creates parts complexity for owners -- Turbo Arrows do not share cylinders, accessories, or many systems with naturally-aspirated Arrow IIIs.

T-Tail (Arrow IV)

The Arrow IV's T-tail introduced in 1979 was a controversial design change:

  • Aerodynamically refined (claimed +5 KTAS cruise)
  • Distinctive appearance
  • BUT: Reduced pitch authority at low speeds
  • Susceptible to "T-tail lockout" in deep stall recovery
  • Some pilots prefer Arrow III's conventional tail for handling

The T-tail era was short-lived -- Piper returned to conventional tails in late production. Arrow III (1977-1978) and post-1990 Arrows all have conventional tails; only 1979-1989 Arrow IV/Turbo Arrow IV have T-tails.

Performance

  • Cruise (FL180): 165 KTAS at 75% power
  • Climb: 940 FPM at sea level
  • Fuel burn: 12.0 GPH cruise
  • Service ceiling: 20,000 ft
  • Range: 880 NM with reserves at 77 gal fuel
  • Useful load: 1,145 lbs

The Turbo Arrow's 165 KTAS at FL180 approaches Bonanza A36TC speed (170-175 KTAS) at significantly lower acquisition cost.

Piper Archer
For saleSimilar aircraftListing

1998 Piper Archer

Archer III · GNS 430W · Honest Trainer · Fresh Annual

$139,9004,980 hrs TT · Frederick, MDView listing →

Valuation Factors

VariantConditionPrice Range
Turbo Arrow III (1977-1978)Well-maintained$90,000-$135,000
Turbo Arrow IV T-tail (1979-1985)Well-maintained$100,000-$155,000
Turbo Arrow IV late (1986-1989)Well-maintained$120,000-$175,000

Turbo Arrows trade at $20,000-$40,000 premium over NA Arrow IIIs of comparable year.

Financing partnerExample placement
Cirrus SR22
For saleSimilar aircraftListing

2019 Cirrus SR22

One Owner · Platinum · FIKI · Low 690 Hours · Hangared

$895,000690 hrs TT · Scottsdale, AZView listing →

ADs & Common Problems

Universal Arrow concerns plus turbo-specific:

  1. TSIO-360 cylinder condition: Continental turbocharged engines run hot; high CHT history shortens cylinder life dramatically.
  2. Turbocharger condition: Inspect for shaft play, oil seepage. Turbo replacement: $5,000-$8,000.
  3. Exhaust system condition: Turbo exhausts crack more frequently; inspect welds and slip joints carefully.
  4. Wastegate operation: Verify smooth wastegate operation through full power range.
  5. Cool-down practice: 3-5 min cool-down essential. Inconsistent cool-down history = shorter turbo life.
  6. T-tail aerodynamics review (Arrow IV): Verify proper rigging; T-tail rigging issues can be subtle.

For sale (0)

No listings for this model right now.