Cessna 172S Skyhawk SP vs Piper Archer
Head-to-head — specs, at a glance.
i
iCessna 172S Skyhawk SP
The modern Cessna 172 represents the latest chapter of the most-produced aircraft in aviation history, with over 44,000 total 172s built across all variants since 1956. Cessna restarted 172 production in 1997 after a decade-long hiatus caused by product liability concerns, introducing the 172R as its return-to-market model and following quickly with the 172S Skyhawk SP in 1998. Both models share the same airframe lineage but introduced fuel injection, a significantly modernized interior, and eventually the Garmin G1000 glass cockpit that transformed the type from a basic trainer into a genuinely capable IFR platform.
- +Excellent parts availability and mechanic familiarity worldwide
- +G1000 glass cockpit makes capable single-pilot IFR platform
- +Predictable, honest performance with 124 KTAS cruise and 550+ nm range
- !Hot-start difficulties on fuel-injected engine common in real-world operation
- !Alternator runs near capacity with full G1000 avionics; failures more common than analog variants
- !Marginal performance at high density altitude with full fuel and four occupants
Piper Archer
The Piper PA-28 Archer is the four-seat touring workhorse of the PA-28 Cherokee family, offering 180 horsepower and a meaningful step up in useful load and cruise speed over the Warrior. The Archer lineage traces back to 1963 with the original PA-28-180 Cherokee 180, one of the first truly practical four-seat Cherokees, and extends through continuous production to the present day as the Archer LX and Archer DLX — making it one of the longest-running production aircraft in general aviation history.
- +Excellent cross-country performer: 125 KTAS cruise, 565 nm range, four comfortable seats
- +Bulletproof engine & parts support: O-360 is most-produced aircraft engine; PA-28 fleet largest in GA
- +Docile handling & honest performance: delivers POH numbers; forgiving for instrument training
- !Wing spar fatigue AD (2024-20-XX) now dominates pre-buy: inspection & potential reinforcement kit required
- !Moderate altitude performance: adequate at 5,000 ft DA but marginal above 7,500 ft DA at gross weight
- !Higher fuel burn than Warrior: 9–10 GPH at 75% power; operating costs $2,000–$4,000/year more than Warrior
Comparing a specific airplane you found for sale?
Get a Tail # Report on that tail number →