Beechcraft Baron 58 (1970-2005) vs Piper PA-34-220T Seneca V

Head-to-head — specs, at a glance.

Beechcraft Baron 58 (1970-2005)
Beechcraft Baron 58 (1970-2005)
Piper PA-34-220T Seneca V
Seats
6 · 6
Engine
piston twin · piston twin
Gear
Retract · Retract
Beechcraft Baron 58 (1970-2005)Piper PA-34-220T Seneca V
Cruise speedKTAS
200
197
Stall speed (Vs0)lower is betterKIAS
75
61
Rangenm
1,480
700
Useful loadlbs
1,850
1,380
Full-fuel payloadlbs
686
642
Service ceilingft
20.7k
25.0k
Fuel burnlower is bettergph
27
26.4
Cruise MPGmpg
8.5
8.6
Typical pricelower is betterUSD
$295k
$280k

Beechcraft Baron 58 (1970-2005)

The 1970 Beechcraft Baron 58 was the **stretched, cargo-door successor to the Baron 55** -- 10 inches longer fuselage, dual cargo doors on the right side (similar to the A36 Bonanza), and 285 HP per side as standard. The 58 quickly became the **most popular Baron variant** and remained in production through 2005 in this pre-G58 configuration, with a G1000-equipped G58 succeeding it for current production.

  • +Dual cargo doors enable stretcher/bulk loading and flexible passenger access
  • +200+ KTAS cruise with 6-seat comfort; gold standard for owner-flown light twins
  • +IO-550-C engines (1984+) offer improved reliability and 300 HP per side
  • !Cargo door seals prone to deterioration; water intrusion and cold drafts in rear cabin
  • !IO-520-C engines (pre-1984) have known top-end cylinder issues at mid-time
  • !Single-engine ceiling only 7,400 ft; requires careful performance planning
See the full 58 profile →

Piper PA-34-220T Seneca V

The Piper PA-34 Seneca is a six-seat, twin-engine light aircraft that has been in production, in various forms, since 1971. Developed as a twin-engine derivative of the Piper Cherokee Six, the PA-34 was first certified on 7 May 1971 and introduced as a 1972 model year aircraft. With over 5,000 airframes built through 2019 and licensed production in Brazil (Embraer EMB-810) and Poland (PZL M-20 Mewa), the Seneca is one of the most successful piston twins ever produced.

  • +Counter-rotating engines eliminate critical-engine handling; ideal multi-engine trainer
  • +Spacious six-seat cabin with aft cargo door; practical business transport
  • +Turbocharged variants cruise 188–195 knots at altitude with 700 nm IFR range
  • !Twin-engine operating costs ($35k–$45k annually at 100 hours); uneconomical for local flying
  • !Nose gear collapse risk from bolt fatigue and rigging neglect; repetitive AD inspection burden
  • !TSIO-360 top-end distress common if lean-of-peak operation poorly monitored; compression checks essential
See the full PA-34 profile →

Comparing a specific airplane you found for sale?

Get a Tail # Report on that tail number →