Eclipse · 2013–2017
Eclipse 550
Specifications
Performance
Cruise
375KTAS
Range
1,125nm
Climb
3456fpm
Ceiling
41,000ft
Fuel Burn
59.0gph
Fuel Cap.
251gal
MPG
7.3mpg
Stall (Vs0)
—KIAS
T/O roll
—ft
Ldg roll
—ft
Size & weight
Seats
6
Useful Load
2,283lbs
Full-fuel payload
602lbs
Max gross
6,000lbs
Wingspan
37.9ft
Length
33.5ft
Engine
Engine
Pratt & Whitney Canada PW610F-A
Power
0hp
TBO
3,000hrs
Overhaul
—each
Engines
2
Owning it
Hull insurance
$20k/yr
Parts
fair
Mechanics
specialist
Gear
Retractable
IFR
Yes
Category
certified
Full specification
V-speeds
Airframe
- Empty weight
- 3,717 lbs
- Max fuel weight
- 1,681 lbs
- Height
- 11 ft
- Wing position
- low
Obstacle performance
- Takeoff over 50 ft
- 2,394 ft
- Landing over 50 ft
- 2,342 ft
Paperwork
- Type certificate
- A00002AC
- Certification basis
- 14 CFR Part 23 through Amendment 55 (except 23.1303 Amdt 23-62), Part 34 Amdt 34-3, Part 36 Amdt 36-28 -- one basis for the whole type, no separate '550' basis
These figures are typical for the model, not a specification for any individual aircraft. Real-world numbers vary with year, installed equipment, weight, modifications and engine condition — often by more than you would expect. Use them to compare types, and confirm anything you would act on against the Pilot's Operating Handbook for that specific airframe and a prebuy inspection.
Pricing
Typical
$2.0M
Range
$1.8M – $2.4M
Annual all-in
~$157k/yr
All-in at ~100 flying hours a year, using the midpoint of each range — the same figures broken out under “Cost to own” below. Your number will differ, and mostly for two reasons. Experience sets your insurance: a 2,000-hour pilot with recent training pays 30–40% less than a 200-hour owner, and student owners pay 20–40% more — on the same aircraft that is often a doubling. Location sets your hangar: a T-hangar runs $200–400 a month in the Midwest against $400–1,500 in a coastal metro, and an outside tie-down is less again. Engine reserves move too — a local shop reusing your serviceable cylinders can come in 30–50% under the national specialty-shop pricing we quote, though you trade the warranty and turnaround that comes with it. Reserves are money set aside toward a future overhaul, not a bill this year, and the annual inspection figure is the shop’s labor to look — whatever they find is separate.
Cost to own — estimate
Set your yearly hours and local fuel price. Fixed costs (insurance, hangar, annual inspection) don't change with hours; fuel, maintenance and the engine program do.
- Fuel (59 gph)
- $35,400
- Engine program
- $43,000
- Maintenance, parts & wear items ($130/hr)
- $13,000
- Insurance
- $16,300–$32,650
- Hangar
- $10,284–$25,710
- Annual inspection (labor only)
- $18,000
- Databases & subscriptions
- $2,500
- Total per year
- $154,372
- Per flight hour
- $1,544
- Miles flown / year (at cruise)
- 43,154 mi
- Cost per mile
- $3.58/mi
- Time in the air
- 48 min
- Fuel burned
- 47 gal
- Out of pocket
- $731
Fuel, engine reserve and wear only. Insurance, hangar and the annual are already paid whether you make the trip or not, so they are not charged here.
Estimate, not a quote. Where a line shows a range, the total, per-hour and per-mile figures use its midpoint— insurance moves most with your experience and time in type, hangar with where you base the aircraft, so your own number could sit at either end. Annual inspection is the shop's labor to open and inspect — what they find is the maintenance line, which covers oil changes, plugs, tires, brakes, hoses, lights, a battery and vacuum pump amortised over their life, and the unscheduled squawks that are the largest and least predictable part of it. The engine line is an hourly maintenance program (JSSI, P&W ESP, Williams TAP or similar), not a reserve you control — it is a contract paid per flight hour, and enrolment transfers with the aircraft, so confirm it at prebuy.
Strengths
- 375 KTAS cruise speed (per 2013 manufacturer data)
- 6-seat configuration
- Pratt & Whitney Canada PW610F-A reliability
Weaknesses
- Single-engine ceiling of 35,000 ft unverified and unusually high for class
- Single-engine rate of climb (826 fpm) significantly lower than 500 variant
- Takeoff/landing distances lack ground-roll data and obstacle-clearance clarity
- Performance specs conflict with earlier 500-series publications
Performance
Cruise speed corrected this session, and it disagrees with the 500's own
figure. Eclipse Aerospace's own 2013 comparison table for the 550 states
375 KTAS maximum cruise — 5 kt above the 370 KTAS the eclipse-500 page
carries from a different manufacturer era's own publication (Eclipse
Aviation, 2008). Both are the manufacturer's own numbers for the same
airframe at different points in its production life; the disagreement is
recorded rather than averaged away.
Two performance figures disagree with the 500 by far more than 5 knots, and neither is resolved. One-engine-inoperative rate of climb is 826 fpm here against the 500's 989 fpm (16% apart), and one-engine-inoperative service ceiling is 35,000 ft here against the 500's 25,000 ft — a 40% gap. Both numbers on both pages are the manufacturer's own published figures. This page's single weakest figure is the 35,000 ft single-engine ceiling — it is a striking number for a light twinjet and cannot be independently checked against a second source this session.
Takeoff and landing distances are a judgment call, not a certainty. The manufacturer's comparison table gives one unlabelled "Takeoff Distance" (2,394 ft) and one "Landing Distance" (2,342 ft), with no ground-roll figure and no explicit "to 50 ft" qualifier on either. Both are stored as the obstacle-inclusive ("over 50 ft") figures on the reasoning that this is how the table's own cited methodology (Conklin & de Decker) normally reports Part 23 distances — but neither is unambiguous, and no ground-roll number is published anywhere found this session.
Payload & Range
Useful load is 2,283 lb and full fuel is 1,681 lb (250.9 gal) — so full fuel leaves 602 lb of payload. Both weights are corrected this session (previously 2,445 / 1,683 lb, uncited): neither empty weight nor useful load is directly published anywhere found this session, so both are DERIVED by solving the manufacturer's own "Available Payload w/ Max Fuel" figure (602 lb) against the certificate's own max takeoff weight (6,000 lb) and fuel weight — see the manufacturer passage for the full arithmetic. The 602 lb result is not a coincidence: it is the same 602 lb the manufacturer published directly, which is what makes this derivation a genuine check rather than a guess. 602 lb is the number to plan against, not the seat count.
The 6 seats include the right-hand cockpit seat, which manufacturers count as a passenger position. A single-pilot owner can genuinely fill it; a two-crew operator cannot.
| Loading | People + bags | Fuel | Still-air range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pilot + 2 adults (602 lb — the manufacturer's own max payload at full fuel) | 602 lb | 250.9 gal | ~1,314 nm |
| All 6 seats filled, bags | 1,300 lb | 147 gal | ~650 nm |
Adults counted at 200 lb, 45-minute IFR reserve held back at cruise burn. Still-air and optimistic — the climb burns well above the cruise rate, and wind is not modelled. Plan shorter. Note how little margin the lower useful load leaves versus the 500: filling all 6 seats on the 550 leaves noticeably less fuel for the same payload than the earlier-block 500 this session re-sourced.

1998 Beechcraft Bonanza A36
GTN 750 · GFC 500 · Mid-Time IO-550 · No Damage

2002 Beechcraft Baron 58
G500 TXi · GTN 750 · Known-Ice · Air Conditioning
For sale (0)
No listings for this model right now.
Also worth looking at
What buyers usually weigh against the Eclipse 550 — aircraft flown for the same kind of mission.